15 Police Officers Allegedly Linked to Sabungeros’ Disappearance Now Under Restricted Custody: DOJ Tightens Grip in Expanding Probe

Manila, Philippines — July 2025
In a major development in the ongoing investigation into the mysterious disappearance of several cockfighting enthusiasts, or sabungeros, the Department of Justice (DOJ) confirmed that 15 police officers suspected of involvement in the case have been placed under restricted custody. This move signals intensified efforts by authorities to secure justice in one of the Philippines’ most complex and high-profile criminal investigations.

Background: The Missing Sabungeros Case

The missing sabungeros case refers to the disappearance of at least 34 individuals involved in online cockfighting (e-sabong) from late 2021 to 2022. Despite earlier leads, the case had gone cold — until whistleblowers, new testimonies, and digital evidence reignited the public’s attention in 2024.

Key suspects include influential figures in the gaming industry, including Charlie “Atong” Ang, and more recently, Gretchen Barretto, along with allegations of police involvement, corruption, and conspiracy.

DOJ and PNP Confirm Restricted Custody

The Philippine National Police (PNP) and DOJ confirmed on July 5, 2025, that 15 police officers have been taken into restricted custody, a status where personnel remain under internal detention, closely monitored, and separated from active duty.

“We have reason to believe that these officers may have either direct or indirect involvement in operations leading to the disappearance of the sabungeros,” said DOJ Secretary Jesus Crispin Remulla in a statement.

The move follows mounting evidence, including surveillance footage, call logs, and statements from whistleblowers, suggesting that certain police units may have been used to conduct unauthorized arrests or facilitate the handover of the missing individuals.

Nature of the Allegations

While full details have not been disclosed due to the ongoing investigation, sources close to the probe allege that:

Some officers acted under orders from higher-ups to “escort” certain sabungeros who were never seen again.
Others may have provided logistical support, including use of official vehicles and intelligence information, to abduct victims under the guise of legal operations.
There are suspicions that certain police units received cash incentives or bribes tied to the case.

One DOJ insider noted, “These aren’t isolated incidents. There’s a pattern that suggests a coordinated effort, possibly to silence or intimidate sabungeros tied to illegal betting disputes.”

The Importance of Restricted Custody

Placing officers under restricted custody serves several purposes:

Preventing tampering of evidence

Ensuring their safety

Signal of accountability

Involvement of the NBI and Task Forces

The National Bureau of Investigation (NBI) is playing a crucial role alongside the DOJ’s Special Investigation Task Force. They are now working under a multi-agency task force model to avoid internal conflicts of interest and guarantee impartial handling.

Reaction from the Public and Lawmakers

The public response has been mixed — with anger, relief, and renewed calls for police reform.

“This is long overdue,” said Senator Risa Hontiveros, who had previously launched a Senate inquiry into police abuse and e-sabong corruption. “The families of the missing sabungeros deserve closure, and that begins with accountability.”

On social media, the hashtag #JusticeForSabungeros trended following the DOJ’s announcement.

Timeline of the Missing Sabungeros Investigation

2021-2022: Initial reports of sabungeros going missing across several provinces.
Early 2023: Police classify the cases as “cold,” citing lack of leads.
Late 2024: Whistleblower “Totoy” emerges, implicating major names in the industry.
Mid-2025: USB evidence submitted to DOJ; Atong Ang and Gretchen Barretto named suspects.
July 2025: 15 police officers placed under restricted custody.

Broader Implications for the PNP

This case comes amid growing scrutiny over corruption and abuse within the Philippine National Police. The implication of uniformed officers in such a high-profile case could severely damage institutional credibility.

Analysts warn that this could erode public trust if systemic changes aren’t implemented:

Stricter vetting and background checks
Independent oversight committees
Protection for whistleblowers inside law enforcement

The Human Toll: Families Still Waiting

Behind the legal processes and political maneuvering are families who still have no answers. Most of the missing sabungeros have been gone for over two years, with no confirmed sightings or remains.

“We’re not asking for miracles. We’re just asking for the truth,” said the sister of one victim. “If police officers are involved, they must pay, no matter their rank.”

Conclusion

The restricted custody of 15 police officers marks a crucial step toward resolving the missing sabungeros case. However, this development also underscores the complex and disturbing possibility of institutional involvement in a crime that has haunted dozens of Filipino families.

With suspects now including law enforcement officers, business tycoons, and celebrities, the public waits anxiously for one thing: justice.