They entered the race with loud music, viral slogans, and flashy stunts—thinking a little entertainment would win over the public. But when the ballots were counted, these candidates were nowhere near the winners’ circle. Why? Because their “pakulo” didn’t just flop—they offended, confused, or embarrassed the very people they were trying to impress.

One of the most talked-about election blunders came from a mayoral candidate who decided to dance onstage dressed as a superhero, complete with cape and cheesy sound effects. The stunt, intended to portray him as a “hero for the people,” instead turned into an internet meme. “We need real solutions, not comedy,” one voter commented online. The video racked up millions of views, but the votes? They never came.

Another congressional hopeful went viral for the wrong reasons when she handed out garlic and onions as campaign giveaways, calling them “symbols of strength and Filipino pride.” Netizens weren’t amused. Many felt insulted, especially as food prices soared and families struggled. “Is she making fun of our poverty?” asked a woman in a now-trending Facebook live video. That candidate placed dead last in the polls.

Then there was the TikTok-obsessed governor wannabe who spent more time creating dance challenges than discussing policies. While his followers ballooned on social media, his credibility plummeted. One campaign volunteer admitted anonymously, “We begged him to talk about his platform, but he said people just want to be entertained.” On election day, voters proved him wrong.

Even worse were the insensitive gimmicks. A senatorial candidate once staged a mock “funeral” for corruption, complete with coffin and actors pretending to cry. While he aimed to deliver a strong message, the public saw it as disrespectful and distasteful. “It was painful to watch,” one netizen said. “Corruption is real—but this turned it into a joke.”

Sometimes, these failed stunts stem from desperation—a last-ditch effort to gain attention in a crowded race. But voters today are smarter, more critical, and quick to call out insincerity. Gimmicks that worked a decade ago now feel outdated or cringeworthy. And with social media, every misstep is immortalized and amplified.

PR experts say authenticity still matters. “When you use a gimmick, it must align with your message and values,” said one campaign strategist. “Otherwise, it becomes noise—or worse, backlash.” That’s what happened to one mayoral candidate who paraded around a giant inflatable version of his own head. Meant to symbolize “big ideas,” it was mocked endlessly. His opponents didn’t even have to campaign hard—the internet did the job for them.

Other candidates made the mistake of copying viral trends without understanding the context. A young council aspirant filmed a parody of a popular teleserye scene, complete with dramatic crying and dialogue. But instead of making voters laugh, many felt it trivialized the hardships they face daily. “We’re tired of being laughed at,” one youth leader tweeted. “We want leaders who respect our struggle.”

Of course, not all creative ideas are bad. Some politicians have successfully used humor and entertainment to connect with voters—when done with sincerity and substance. But the line between clever and cringeworthy is thin. And once crossed, it’s hard to recover.

For many of these losing candidates, the post-election reality is sobering. Their videos may live on, but their political dreams have stalled. Some issued apologies. Others doubled down, claiming the people just didn’t “get the message.” But the message voters heard was clear: gimmicks don’t substitute for genuine leadership.

This election cycle served as a wake-up call—not just to politicians, but to campaign teams, influencers, and media strategists. Voters are no longer easily swayed by flashy lights or trending hashtags. They want plans, integrity, and connection. And when they see a candidate treating their vote like a joke, they respond with silence at the polls.

The story of these failed campaigns is more than just political gossip. It reflects a changing electorate—one that demands respect and results, not theatrics. The age of the “pakulo” may not be over, but it’s definitely being redefined.

So the next time a candidate considers donning a costume, launching a TikTok challenge, or staging a bizarre event, they might want to ask: is this really for the people—or just for show?

Because in the end, when the votes are in and the crowds disperse, gimmicks fade—but leadership, or the lack of it, remains.